Evaluating the Capacity of Theories of Justice to Serve as a Justice Framework for International Clinical Research
Graduate studies at Western
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (11):30-41 (2012)
|Abstract||This article investigates whether or not theories of justice from political philosophy, first, support the position that health research should contribute to justice in global health, and second, provide guidance about what is owed by international clinical research (ICR) actors to parties in low- and middle-income countries. Four theories?John Rawls's theory of justice, the rights-based cosmopolitan theories of Thomas Pogge and Henry Shue, and Jennifer Ruger's health capability paradigm?are evaluated. The article shows that three of the four theories require the conduct of health research for justice in global health. The theories help identify the ends of justice to which ICR is to contribute, but they cannot tell us how to organize ICR to promote these ends. Aside from Ruger's health capability paradigm, the theories also lack an allocative principle for assigning specific duties to specific actors. This creates difficulties for establishing obligations for certain types of ICR actors|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff (2013). A Framework to Link International Clinical Research to the Promotion of Justice in Global Health. Bioethics 27 (3).
Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff (2013). Linking International Research to Global Health Equity: The Limited Contribution of Bioethics. Bioethics 27 (4):208-214.
Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff (2011). Justice in International Clinical Research. Developing World Bioethics 11 (2):75-81.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2011). Shared Health Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):32 - 45.
Andrew M. Courtwright (2007). Justice, Health, and Status. Theoria 54 (112):1-24.
Alex John London (2005). Justice and the Human Development Approach to International Research. Hastings Center Report 35 (1):24-37.
Marcus Arvan (2012). Reconceptualizing Human Rights. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):1-15.
Dani Filc (2007). The Liberal Grounding of the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Critique. Theoria 54 (112):51-72.
Marcus Arvan (2012). Reconceptualizing Human Rights. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):91-105.
James Dwyer (2007). What's Wrong with the Global Migration of Health Care Professionals? Individual Rights and International Justice. Hastings Center Report 37 (5):36-43.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2009). Global Health Justice. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):261-275.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice. Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Matthew Lindauer (2012). The Focus on Health Capability and Role of States in Ruger's Global Health Justice Framework. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):57-59.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-17
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?