Formalising ordinary legal disputes: A case study [Book Review]

Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359 (2008)
This paper presents a formal reconstruction of a Dutch civil legal case in Prakken’s formal model of adjudication dialogues. The object of formalisation is the argumentative speech acts exchanged during the dispute by the adversaries and the judge. The goal of this formalisation is twofold: to test whether AI & law models of legal dialogues in general, and Prakken’s model in particular, are suitable for modelling particular legal procedures; and to learn about the process of formalising an actual legal dispute.
Keywords Legal argument  Legal procedure  Dialogue games  Case files
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-008-9069-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Martin Neumann (2012). The Cognitive Legacy of Norm Simulation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (4):339-357.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #295,956 of 1,932,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #271,859 of 1,932,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.