Husserl contra Carnap: la démarcation des sciences

In Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jaccobs & Filip Mattens (eds.), PHILOSOPHY PHENOMENOLOGY SCIENCES. Springer. pp. 157--189 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the sources and implications of Carnap’s Der Raum.Abraham D. Stone - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):65-74.
Truth, method, and objectivity Husserl and Gadamer on scientific method.A. T. Nuyen - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (4):437-452.
Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 2008 - Husserl Studies 24 (2):131-140.
The problem of other minds: A debate between schrödinger and Carnap. [REVIEW]Michel Bitbol - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):115-123.
Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the method of the human sciences.Donald McIntosh - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
Empirical equivalence in the Quine-Carnap debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominique Pradelle
Université Paris-Sorbonne

Citations of this work

From Aesthetic to Epistemic Structures and back: Complex Dynamics between Art and Science.Fausto Fraisopi - 2019 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 12 (1):41-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references