Promises and perlocutions

In Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass 93-119 (2003)
This is a critical analysis of T.M. Scanlon's contractualist account of promising and promissory obligation. After situating Scanlon's account within one of two broad schools of thought on promising (the 'perlocutionary' school) I argue that his account fails to overcome a fatal circularity that plagues all such theories of promise. I go on to argue that Scanlon's contractualist moral theory will support an alternative, non-perlocutionary theory of promise that is not susceptible to this logical difficulty.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230410001702612
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrea C. Westlund (2013). Deference as a Normative Power. Philosophical Studies 166 (3):455-474.
Neal A. Tognazzini (2007). The Hybrid Nature of Promissory Obligation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (3):203–232.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

20 ( #231,922 of 1,932,455 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #225,373 of 1,932,455 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.