What philosophy of biology should be
Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):119-127 (2011)
| Abstract | This paper reviews Rosenberg’s and McShea’s textbook in philosophy of biology, entitled Philosophy of Biology. A Contemporary Introduction. I insist on the excellent quality of this textbook, then I turn to more critical comments, which deal mainly with what philosophy of biology is, and what it should be | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Cornelis Eliza Bertus Bremekamp (1962). The Various Aspects of Biology: Essays by a Botanist on the Classification and Main Contents of the Principal Branches of Biology. Noord-Hollandsche Uitg. Mij..
Catherine Kendig (2011). Debates in Philosophy of Biology: One Long Argument, or Many? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):73 - 81.
Ingo Brigandt (2011). Philosophy of Biology. In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum Press.
Marc Lange (2004). The Autonomy of Functional Biology: A Reply to Rosenberg. Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):93-109.
Werner Callebaut (2005). Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is Not. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2).
Denis Alexander & Ronald L. Numbers (eds.) (2010). Biology and Ideology From Descartes to Dawkins. The University of Chicago Press.
Steven P. R. Rose (1987). Molecules and Minds: Essays on Biology and the Social Order. Open University Press.
Alexander Rosenberg (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge University Press.
Matt Gers (2011). The Long Reach of Philosophy of Biology. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):439-447.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-06-10Total downloads56 ( #17,799 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

