Vivarium 49 (1-3):127-149 (2011)
|Abstract||In 1980 L. M. de Rijk edited some texts connected with medieval disputation ( Die mittelaterlichen Traktate De modo opponendi et respondendi ), towards which he showed a strikingly contemptuous attitude. The reason for his contempt was that the treatises did not fit the obligationes and sophismata tradition. In this article I focus on the original version, the Thesaurus Philosophorum , to highlight the distinction of this family of treatises with respect to the “modern“ tradition. First, I study the features of the disputation that can be recognised through the collection of fallacious arguments contained in the Thesaurus . Second, I briefly examine the contents of the treatise and their arrangement, showing that they are closely related to the kind of disputation in question. I hope to support the idea that neither the technique of disputation nor the contents and their arrangement deserve a straightforward rejection|
|Keywords||late-medieval disputation Aristotelian logic logica modernorum sophismata tradition obligationes tradition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Egbert P. Bos & Thomas (eds.) (2004). Logica Modernorum in Prague About 1400: The Sophistria Disputation 'Quoniam Quatuor' (Ms Cracow, Jagiellonian Library 686, Ff. 1ra-79rb), with a Partial Reconstruction of Thomas of Cleve's Logica. [REVIEW] Brill.
Mary M. Garrett (1997). Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation. Argumentation 11 (2):195-209.
E. J. Ashworth (1986). Renaissance Man as Logician: Josse Clichtove (1472–1543) on Disputations. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):15-29.
Ignacio Angelelli (1983). Die Mittelalterlichen Traktate de Modo Opponendi Et Respondendi. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2).
Margaret Cameron & John Marenbon (eds.) (2011). Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500. Brill.
Hans-Ulrich Wohler (2011). The first philosophical faculty in Saxony up to the beginning of the Reformation in its local, regional, and supraregional context. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):217-240.
Nicolas Clerbout, Marie-Hélène Gorisse & Shahid Rahman (2011). Context-Sensitivity in Jain Philosophy: A Dialogical Study of Siddharṣigaṇi's Commentary on the Handbook of Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (5):633-662.
Jan Pinborg (1979). The English Contribution to Logic Before Ockham. Synthese 40 (1):19 - 42.
Charles H. Manekin (1996). Some Aspects of the Assertoric Syllogism in Medieval Hebrew Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):49-71.
C. Dutilh Novaes (2005). Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance. Synthese 145 (3):371 - 395.
Nicholas Rescher (1977). Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press.
John Marenbon (ed.) (2007). The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions: Special Offprint of Vivarium 45, 2-3 (2007). [REVIEW] Brill.
Claude Albert (2007). Mental Language and Tradition Encounters in Medieval Philosophy : Anselm, Albert and Ockham. In John Marenbon (ed.), The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions: Special Offprint of Vivarium 45, 2-3 (2007). Brill.
Eleonore Stump (1984). The Logic of Disputation in Walter Burley's Treatise on Obligations. Synthese 58 (2):355 - 374.
Eleonore Stump (1985). The Logic of Disputation in Walter Burley's Treatise on Obligations. Synthese 63 (3):355 - 374.
Added to index2011-08-26
Total downloads4 ( #188,906 of 722,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?