Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):1-20 (2001)
| Abstract | There is disagreement in the literature about the exact nature of the phenomenon of empathy. There are emotional, cognitive, and conditioning views, applying in varying degrees across species. An adequate description of the ultimate and proximate mechanism can integrate these views. Proximately, the perception of an object's state activates the subject's corresponding representations, which in turn activate somatic and autonomic responses. This mechanism supports basic behaviors (e.g., alarm, social facilitation, vicariousness of emotions, mother-infant responsiveness, and the modeling of competitors and predators) that are crucial for the reproductive success of animals living in groups. The Perception-Action Model (PAM), together with an understanding of how representations change with experience, can explain the major empirical effects in the literature (similarity, familiarity, past experience, explicit teaching, and salience). It can also predict a variety of empathy disorders. The interaction between the PAM and prefrontal functioning can also explain different levels of empathy across species and age groups. This view can advance our evolutionary understanding of empathy beyond inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism and can explain different levels of empathy across individuals, species, stages of development, and situations. Key Words: altruism; cognitive empathy; comparative; emotion; emotional contagion; empathy; evolution; human; perception-action; perspective taking. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDoris Bischof-Köhler (2012). Empathy and Self-Recognition in Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic Perspective. Emotion Revies 4 (1):40-48.
Anthony P. Atkinson (2001). Emotion-Specific Clues to the Neural Substrate of Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):22-23.
Lisa A. Parr (2001). Understanding Other's Emotions: From Affective Resonance to Empathic Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):44-45.
Martin L. Hoffman (2001). How Automatic and Representational is Empathy, and Why. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):38-39.
Linda Mealey & Stuart Kinner (2001). The Perception-Action Model of Empathy and Psychopathic “Cold-Heartedness”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):42-43.
Ross Buck (2002). “Choice” and “Emotion” in Altruism: Reflections on the Morality of Justice Versus the Morality of Caring. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):254-255.
Jay Schulkin (2001). Psychobiological Basis of Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):46-47.
Elias L. Khalil (2001). Similarity Versus Familiarity: When Empathy Becomes Selfish. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):41-41.
Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal (2001). Empathy: Each is in the Right – Hopefully, Not All in the Wrong. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):49-58.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #65,278 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
