David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):229-254 (2012)
On some theories of rights, such as the Choice theory, only agents can have moral rights. The realm of right-holders thus excludes several potential candidates, among which are young children, mentally incapacitated persons, and groups since these are thought to lack the required degree of agency. This paper argues that groups can be right-holders. The argument comes in three steps: first, it is argued that full-blown or autonomous agency is not required for the possession of Choice theory rights, second, that groups can be seen as agents, albeit in a limited sense, and third, that groups can make irreducibly collective choices in spite of their limited agency. The upshot of this argument is that groups can have rights, provided that they are organized around a coherent decision-making procedure; furthermore, this account can be employed to argue that other creatures of limited agency are possible right-holders.
|Keywords||collective choice agency responsibility group rights Choice theory of rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adina Preda (2015). Rights: Concept and Justification. Ratio Juris 28 (3):408-415.
Frank Hindriks (2014). How Autonomous Are Collective Agents? Corporate Rights and Normative Individualism. Erkenntnis 79 (9):1565-1585.
Andrew Shorten (2015). Are There Rights to Institutional Exemptions? Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (2):242-263.
Similar books and articles
E. Glen Weyl (2009). Whose Rights? A Critique of Individual Agency as the Basis of Rights. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):139-171.
Erol Kuyurtar (2007). Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Rachael Briggs (2012). The Normative Standing of Group Agents. Episteme 9 (3):283-291.
Philip Pettit & David Schweikard (2006). Joint Actions and Group Agents. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):18-39.
Martha Nussbaum (2003). The Complexity of Groups: A Comment on Jorge Valadez. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):57-69.
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2006). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
S. Matthew Liao (2010). Agency and Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
Kwame Anthony Appiah (2011). “Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action. Journal of Ethics 15 (3):265-280.
Michael D. Smith (1982). The Virtuous Organization. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):35-42.
Suzy Killmister (2011). Group-Differentiated Rights and the Problem of Membership. Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):227-255.
Anna Moltchanova (2008). Group Membership and Morally Risky Epistemic Conditions. Social Philosophy Today 24:53-67.
Carl Wellman (1995). Real Rights. Oxford University Press.
Philip Pettit (2005). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):85-105.
Fabrizio Cariani (2012). Epistemology in Group Agency: Six Objections in Search of the Truth. [REVIEW] Episteme 9 (3):255-269.
Kurt L. Sylvan (2012). How to Be a Redundant Realist. Episteme 9 (3):271-282.
Added to index2012-03-17
Total downloads44 ( #95,279 of 1,907,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,328 of 1,907,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?