David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):83-95 (2006)
Various claims have been made about the influence of Heinrich Hertz's Principles of Mechanics on Wittgenstein's work. I consider some such recent claims, made by Allan Janik, to the effect that Hertz exercised a very strong influence on Wittgenstein, early and late. I suggest they are ill-founded, in virtue of misinterpretations either of Hertz, or of Wittgenstein, or of both. I try to set the record straight on issues such as the three criteria Hertz suggests for evaluating scientific 'representations' [Darstellungen] or 'images' [Bilder], his conception of philosophy, the nature of Hertz's project and its relation to philosophy, the extent to which he agrees and disagrees with Ernst Mach, and his influence on the Tractatus.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew D. Wilson (1989). Hertz, Boltzmann and Wittgenstein Reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (2):245-263.
Lydia Patton (2004). Hermann Cohen's History and Philosophy of Science. Dissertation, McGill University
Peter Barker (1980). Hertz and Wittgenstein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):243-256.
John Preston (2008). Hertz, Wittgenstein and Philosophical Method. Philosophical Investigations 31 (1):48–67.
John Hyman (2001). 'The Urn and the Chamber Pot. In Richard Allen & Malcolm Turvey (eds.), Wittgenstein, Theory, and the Arts. Routledge. 137.
Frederik Voetmann Christiansen (2006). Heinrich Hertz's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science, and its Development by Harald Høffding. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (1):1 - 20.
Andreas Hüttemann (2009). Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz’s Philosophy of Science. In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Natural Sciences. de Gruyter.
Kelly Hamilton (2002). Darstellungen in The Principles of Mechanics and the Tractatus: The Representation of Objects in Relation in Hertz and Wittgenstein. Perspectives on Science 10 (1):28-68.
Peter C. Kjaergaard (2002). Hertz and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):121-149.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #57,625 of 1,096,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?