David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 20 (4):533-564 (2010)
This paper reports a computer program to generate novel designs for the arrangement of furniture within a simulated room. It is based on the engagement-reflection computer model of the creative processes. During engagement the system generates material in the form of sequences of actions (e.g. change the colours of the walls, include some furniture in the room, modify their colour, and so on) guided by content and knowledge constraints. During reflection, the system evaluates the composition produced so far and, if it is necessary, modifies it. We discuss the implementation of the system and some of its most salient features, especially the use of a computational model for creativity in the terrain of design. We argue that this kind of model opens new possibilities for the simulation of the design processes as well as the development of tools
|Keywords||Computational creativity Engagement-reflection Design Furniture arrangement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Santiago Negrete (2010). The Eri-Designer: A Computer Model for the Arrangement of Furniture. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (4):533-564.
Ulrich Krohs (2008). How Digital Computer Simulations Explain Real-World Processes. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):277 – 292.
Ronald N. Giere (2009). Is Computer Simulation Changing the Face of Experimentation? Philosophical Studies 143 (1):59 - 62.
Elena Cavagnaro, Dieuwke Altena & Sarah Seidel (2010). Saving the Commons. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:32-38.
Nicola Angius & Guglielmo Tamburrini (2011). Scientific Theories of Computational Systems in Model Checking. Minds and Machines 21 (2):323-336.
Carole J. Clem & Jean Paul Rigaut (1995). Computer Simulation Modelling and Visualization of 3d Architecture of Biological Tissues. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4).
Timothy Colburn & Gary Shute (2011). Decoupling as a Fundamental Value of Computer Science. Minds and Machines 21 (2):241-259.
Owen Holland (2007). A Strongly Embodied Approach to Machine Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):97-110.
Paul G. Skokowski (1994). Can Computers Carry Content "Inexplicitly&Quot;? Minds and Machines 4 (3):333-44.
Victor L. Yu (1983). Conceptual Obstacles in Computerized Medical Diagnosis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):67-76.
Dave Billinge & Tom Addis (2008). Seeking Allies: Modelling How Listeners Choose Their Musical Friends. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 13 (1):53-66.
W. S. Parker (2006). Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling. Foundations of Science 11 (4):349-368.
Johannes Lenhard (2006). Surprised by a Nanowire: Simulation, Control, and Understanding. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):605-616.
Alexander R. Pruss (2009). Programs, Bugs, DNA and a Design Argument. In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads1 ( #301,481 of 1,004,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?