Undergraduate student perceptions regarding cheating: Tier 1 versus tier 2 AACSB accredited business schools
Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):407 - 418 (2005)
|Abstract||Cheating is fairly commonplace at both Tiers 1 and 2 AACSB accredited business schools. Distinct differences exist between Tiers 1 and 2 students with regard to cheating. Tier 1 students are more likely to cheat on written assignments, they believe sanctions impact cheating, and that a stigma is attached to cheating. Tier 2 students are more likely to cheat on exams, and nearly as likely to cheat on written assignments. Tier 2 students accept the notion that moral and ethical people cheat. Tier 2 students who are Business Administration majors, those who are employed 40 h or more per week, married students, and married students with children are more likely to cheat. At both Tiers 1 and 2 schools Asian students are less likely to cheat, but resident members of fraternities and sororities and those who drink frequently are more likely to cheat.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chun-Hua Hsiao & Chyan Yang (2011). The Impact of Professional Unethical Beliefs on Cheating Intention. Ethics and Behavior 21 (4):301 - 316.
Mark G. Simkin & Alexander McLeod (forthcoming). Why Do College Students Cheat? Journal of Business Ethics.
Stephen B. Salter, Daryl M. Guffey & Jeffrey J. McMillan (2001). Truth, Consequences and Culture: A Comparative Examination of Cheating and Attitudes About Cheating Among U.S. And U.K. Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 31 (1):37 - 50.
Jamee Gresley, Heidi Wallace, Julie M. Hupp & Sara Staats (2009). Heroes Don't Cheat: An Examination of Academic Dishonesty and Students' Views on Why Professors Don't Report Cheating. Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):171-183.
Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg, Marie McKendall & William Mothersell (2007). Cheating During the College Years: How Do Business School Students Compare? Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):197 - 206.
Joel Marks (2003). Cheating 101: Ethics as a Lab Course. Teaching Philosophy 26 (2):131-145.
M. Bloodgood James, H. Turnley William & Peter Mudrack (2008). The Influence of Ethics Instruction, Religiosity, and Intelligence on Cheating Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3).
James M. Bloodgood, William H. Turnley & Peter Mudrack (2008). The Influence of Ethics Instruction, Religiosity, and Intelligence on Cheating Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):557 - 571.
K. Molnar Kathleen, G. Kletke Marilyn & Jongsawas Chongwatpol (2008). Ethics Vs. It Ethics: Do Undergraduate Students Perceive a Difference? Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4).
Kathleen K. Molnar, Marilyn G. Kletke & Jongsawas Chongwatpol (2008). Ethics Vs. It Ethics: Do Undergraduate Students Perceive a Difference? Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):657 - 671.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,475 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?