David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consider this situation: Here are two envelopes. You have one of them. Each envelope contains some quantity of money, which can be of any positive real magnitude. One contains twice the amount of money that the other contains, but you do not know which one. You can keep the money in your envelope, whose numerical value you do not know at this stage, or you can exchange envelopes and have the money in the other. You wish to maximise your money. What should you do?1 Here are three forms of reasoning about this situation, which we shall call..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Maria Pia Paganelli, Endogenous Money and David Hume. Eastern Economic Journal.
Eric Schwitzgebel & Josh Dever (2008). The Two Envelope Paradox and Using Variables Within the Expectation Formula. Sorites.
Paul Syverson (2010). Opening Two Envelopes. Acta Analytica 25 (4):479-498.
Olav Gjelsvik (2002). Paradox Lost, but in Which Envelope? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):353-362.
William F. May (1997). Money and the Medical Profession. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):1-13.
David A. Booth (2006). Money as Tool, Money as Resource: The Biology of Collecting Items for Their Own Sake. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-181.
Raymond S. Nickerson & Ruma Falk (2006). The Exchange Paradox: Probabilistic and Cognitive Analysis of a Psychological Conundrum. Thinking and Reasoning 12 (2):181 – 213.
Russell Belk (2006). Money as Civilizing Ritual. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads115 ( #6,495 of 1,004,649 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,116 of 1,004,649 )
How can I increase my downloads?