David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 16 (1):14-36 (2003)
The author analyzes fictions of legal positivist philosophy and their role in the scientific legitimation of modern law and political domination. The original function of legalist fictions was the establishment of legal science, which would be autonomous and independent of other social sciences and public morality. In the second half of the 20th century, legal positivist philosophy has nevertheless adopted the fiction of the just law as its scientific legitimation fiction and incorporated moral and political discourse into legal science, again.Legal positivism and its critiques within the discourse of the sociology of law and critical legal science keep the image of a hierarchical and centralized legitimation of law. Paradoxically, current legal philosophy and theory searching for a universally valid legitimation scheme is full of many different legitimations and reveals their growing plurality and the impossibility of establishing one sovereign legitimation scheme in the current social, theoretical and political condition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Francis Remedios (2003). Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.
Andrew Cutrofello (1998). Speculative Imagination and the Problem of Legitimation: On David Ingram's Reason, History, and Politics: The Communitarian Grounds of Legitimation in the Modern Age. Social Epistemology 12 (2):117 – 126.
Edward Slowik (2001). Rouse-Ing Out the Legitimation Project: Scientific Practice and the Problem of Demarcation. Ratio 14 (2):171–184.
Alisa Bokulich (2012). Distinguishing Explanatory From Nonexplanatory Fictions. Philosophy of Science 79 (5):725-737.
Kenneth Campbell (1983). Fuller on Legal Fictions. Law and Philosophy 2 (3):339 - 370.
Reina Hayaki (2009). Fictions Within Fictions. Philosophical Studies 146 (3):379 - 398.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2009). Models and Fictions in Science. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):101 - 116.
Joseph Rouse (1994). Engaging Science Through Cultural Studies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:396 - 401.
Tim Button (2012). Spotty Scope and Our Relation to Fictions. Noûs 46 (2):243-58.
Jody Azzouni (2010). Talking About Nothing: Numbers, Hallucinations, and Fictions. Oxford University Press.
Arthur Fine (2009). Science Fictions: Comment on Godfrey-Smith. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):117 - 125.
Eric Miller (1997). Literary Fictions and As-If Fictions. Philosophy and Rhetoric 30 (4):428 - 442.
Gordon Michael Purves (2013). Finding Truth in Fictions: Identifying Non-Fictions in Imaginary Cracks. Synthese 190 (2):235-251.
Timothy McGrew & Lydia McGrew (1998). Internalism and the Collapse of the Gettier Problem. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:239-256.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,244 )
How can I increase my downloads?