Minimally inconsistent LP

Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331 (1991)
The paper explains how a paraconsistent logician can appropriate all classical reasoning. This is to take consistency as a default assumption, and hence to work within those models of the theory at hand which are minimally inconsistent. The paper spells out the formal application of this strategy to one paraconsistent logic, first-order LP. (See, Ch. 5 of: G. Priest, In Contradiction, Nijhoff, 1987.) The result is a strong non-monotonic paraconsistent logic agreeing with classical logic in consistent situations. It is shown that the logical closure of a theory under this logic is trivial only if its closure under LP is trivial.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00370190
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Graham Priest (1979). Logic of Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219-241.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Laura Goodship (1996). On Dialethism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):153 – 161.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

34 ( #139,555 of 1,928,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #149,491 of 1,928,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.