David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):221-243 (2002)
In his widely influential statement of just war theory, Michael Walzer exempts conscripted soldiers from all responsibility for taking part in war, whether just or unjust (the thesis of the moral equality of soldiers). He endows the overwhelming majority of civilians with almost absolute immunity from military attack on the ground that they aren't responsible for the war their country is waging, whether just or unjust. I argue that Walzer is much too lenient on both soldiers and civilians. Soldiers fighting for a just cause and soldiers fighting for an unjust one are not morally equal. A substantial proportion of civilians in a democracy are responsible, to a significant degree, for their country's unjust war. Moreover, under certain (admittedly rare) circumstances, some of them are legitimate targets of military attack. This has bearing on settling moral accounts in the wake of war and the issue of forgiving the wrongs done in its course: possible candidates for such forgiveness are much more numerous than is usually assumed.
|Keywords||civilian immunity conscription ethics of war just war theory soldiers, responsibility of war|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Graham Parsons (2012). Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):2012.
Suzy Killmister (2008). Remote Weaponry: The Ethical Implications. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):121–133.
Robert Sparrow (2005). “Hands Up Who Wants to Die?”: Primoratz on Responsibility and Civilian Immunity in Wartime. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):299 - 319.
Troy Jollimore (2007). Terrorism, War, and the Killing of the Innocent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):353 - 372.
Friderik Klampfer (2004). Moral Responsibility for Unprevented Harm. Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.
Similar books and articles
Igor Primoratz (2011). Civilian Immunity, Supreme Emergency, and Moral Disaster. Journal of Ethics 15 (4):371-386.
Helene Ingierd & Henrik Syse (2005). Responsibility and Culpability in War. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):85-99.
Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton (2009). Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
Uwe Steinhoff (2010). Benbaji on Killing in War and 'the War Convention'. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):616-623.
Lene Bomann-Larsen (2004). Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
Roger Wertheimer (2007). Reconnoitering Combatant Moral Equality. Journal of Military Ethics 6 (1):60-74.
C. A. J. Coady (1980). The Leaders and the Led: Problems of Just War Theory. Inquiry 23 (3):275 – 291.
Nolen Gertz (2008). Just and Unjust Killing. Journal of Military Ethics 7 (4):247-261.
Judith Lichtenberg (2008). How to Judge Soldiers Whose Cause is Unjust. In David Rodin & Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford University Press 112--130.
Jordy Rocheleau (2010). Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars. Social Philosophy Today 26:93-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads209 ( #15,362 of 1,934,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,153 of 1,934,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?