David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Matter 5 (1):7-44 (2007)
A framework for the mind-matter problem in a holistic universe which has no parts is outlined. The conceptual structure of modern quantum theory suggests to use complementary Boolean descriptions as elements for a more comprehensive non-Boolean description of a world without an a priori mind-matter distinction. Such a description in terms of a locally Boolean but globally non-Boolean structure makes allowance for the fact that Boolean descriptions play a privileged role in science. If we accept the insight that there are no ultimate building blocks, the existence of holistic correlations between contextually chosen parts is a natural consequence. The main problem of a genuinely non-Boolean description is to find an appropriate partition of the universe of discourse. If we adopt the idea that all fundamental laws of physics are invariant under time translations, then we can consider a partition of the world into a tenseless and a tensed domain.In the sense of a regulative principle, the material domain is defined as the tenseless domain with its homogeneous time. The tensed domain contains the mental domain with a tensed time characterized by a privileged position, the Now. Since this partition refers to two complementary descriptions which are not given a priori we have to expect correlations between these two domains. In physics it corresponds to Newton 's separation of universal laws of nature and contingent initial conditions Both descriptions have a non-Boolean structure and can be encompassed into a single non-Boolean description. Tensed and tenseless time can be synchronized by holistic correlations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Zheng Wang, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Harald Atmanspacher & Emmanuel M. Pothos (2013). The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):672-688.
Reinhard Blutner, Emmanuel M. Pothos & Peter Bruza (2013). A Quantum Probability Perspective on Borderline Vagueness. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):711-736.
Vassilios Karakostas (2012). Realism and Objectivism in Quantum Mechanics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):45-65.
Thilo Hinterberger & Nikolaus Stillfried (2013). The Concept of Complementarity and its Role in Quantum Entanglement and Generalized Entanglement. Axiomathes 23 (3):443-459.
Reinhard Blutner & Peter Beim Graben (forthcoming). Quantum Cognition and Bounded Rationality. Synthese:1-53.
Similar books and articles
William Lane Craig (1999). Temporal Becoming and the Direction of Time. Philosophy and Theology 11 (2):349-366.
V. L. Selivanov (1995). Fine Hierarchies and Boolean Terms. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):289-317.
Misao Nagayama (1992). On Boolean Algebras and Integrally Closed Commutative Regular Rings. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1305-1318.
Roman Wencel (2003). Definable Sets in Boolean Ordered o-Minimal Structures. II. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):35-51.
Ludomir Newelski & Roman Wencel (2001). Definable Sets in Boolean-Ordered o-Minimal Structures. I. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1821-1836.
Thomas Baldwin (1999). Back to the Present. Philosophy 74 (2):177-197.
Hans Primas (2003). Between Mind and Matter. Mind and Matter 1 (1):81-119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #71,093 of 1,941,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,098 of 1,941,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?