Noûs 37 (2):325 - 341 (2003)
|Abstract||In his late paper ‘General Propositions and Causality’, Ramsey argues that unrestricted universal generalisations such as ‘All men are mortal’ are not genuine propositions.1 About this, as about much else in that paper, Ramsey had recently changed his mind. A few years earlier, both in ‘Facts and Propositions’ and in ‘Mathematical Logic’, he had argued that such generalisations are equivalent to infinite conjunctions.2 But by 1929 his ideas about infinity had changed, and it was concerns about the infinite character of unrestricted generalisations which led him to his new view|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jordan Howard Sobel (1998). Ramsey's Foundations Extended to Desirabilities. Theory and Decision 44 (3):231-278.
Richard B. Miller (1988). Love, Intention, and Proportion: Paul Ramsey on the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):201 - 221.
James Gaffney (1976). The Over-Extended Principle of Totality and Some Underlying Issues. Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):259 - 267.
Olga Markic (1995). Finding the Right Level for Connectionist Representations (a Critical Note on Ramsey's Paper). Acta Analytica 14 (14):27-35.
Gilbert Meilaender (1991). "Love's Casuistry": Paul Ramsey on Caring for the Terminally Ill. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):133 - 156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,690 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?