Sexual morality: Is consent enough? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):201-218 (2001)
The liberal view that valid consent is sufficient for a sex act to be morally legitimate is challenged by three major philosophies of sex: the Catholic view of sex as ordained for procreation and properly confined to marriage, the romantic view of sex as bound up with love, and the radical feminist analysis of sex in our society as part and parcel of the domination of women by men. I take a critical look at all three, focusing on Mary Geach''s recent statement of the procreation view, Roger Scruton''s theory of sexual desire as naturally evolving into intimacy and love, and several radical feminist discussions of sex in sexist society which argue that the notion of consent is unhelpful and, indeed, irrelevant. I argue that none of these lines of argument is convincing, and that consent remains the touchstone of morally permissible sex – although, dmittedly, it may not be very helpful in discussing ideals of human sexuality.
|Keywords||coercion in sex consent to sex sex sexual ideals sexual morality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James Rocha (forthcoming). Aggressive Hook Ups: Modeling Aggressive Casual Sex on BDSM for Moral Permissibility. Res Publica:1-20.
Jan Steutel (2009). Towards a Sexual Ethics for Adolescence. Journal of Moral Education 38 (2):185-198.
Robert Sparrow (2005). “Hands Up Who Wants to Die?”: Primoratz on Responsibility and Civilian Immunity in Wartime. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):299-319.
Similar books and articles
Mal Leicester & Pam Cooke (2002). Rights Not Restrictions for Learning Disabled Adults: A Response to Spiecker and Steutel. Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):181-187.
Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel (2002). Sex Between People with "Mental Retardation": An Ethical Evaluation. Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):155-169.
Jonathan Webber (2009). Sex. Philosophy 84 (2):233-250.
Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel (1997). Paedophilia, Sexual Desire and Perversity. Journal of Moral Education 26 (3):331-342.
Matthew C. Altman (2010). Kant on Sex and Marriage: The Implications for the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Kant-Studien 101 (3):309-330.
Patricia Marino (2008). The Ethics of Sexual Objectification: Autonomy and Consent. Inquiry 51 (4):345 – 364.
Young-Hee Shim (2001). Feminism and the Discourse of Sexuality in Korea: Continuities and Changes. [REVIEW] Human Studies 24 (1-2):133-148.
Seiriol Morgan (2003). Dark Desires. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):377-410.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads198 ( #13,139 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #38,219 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?