Truth as convenient friction

Journal of Philosophy 100 (4):167--190 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Richard Rorty begins by telling us why pragmatists such as himself are inclined to identify truth with justification: ‘Pragmatists think that if something makes no difference to practice, it should make no difference to philosophy. This conviction makes them suspicious of the distinction between justification and truth, for that distinction makes no difference to my decisions about what to do.’ (1995, p. 19) Rorty goes on to discuss the claim, defended by Crispin Wright, that truth is a normative constraint on assertion. He argues that this claim runs foul of this principle of no difference without a practical difference: ‘The need to justify our beliefs to ourselves and our fellow agents subjects us to norms, and obedience to these norms produces a behavioural pattern that we must detect in others before confidently attributing beliefs to them. But there seems to be no occasion to look for obedience to an additional norm – the commandment to seek the truth. For – to return to the pragmatist doubt with which I began – obedience to that commandment will produce no behaviour not produced by the need to offer justification.’ (1995, p. 26) Again, then, Rorty appeals to the claim that a commitment to a norm of truth rather than a norm of justification makes no behavioural difference. This is an empirical claim, testable in principle by comparing the behaviour of a community of realists (in Rorty’s sense) to that of a community of pragmatists. In my view, the experiment would show that the claim is unjustified, indeed false. I think that there is an important and widespread behavioural pattern that depends on the fact that speakers do take themselves to be subject to such an additional norm. Moreover, it is a..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exchange on "Truth as convenient friction".Richard Rorty & Huw Price - 2010 - In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. Columbia University Press.
The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.Mark Okrent - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):381 – 404.
The Right Thing to Believe.Ralph Wedgwood - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 123-139.
The truth Norm of belief.Conor Mchugh - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):8-30.
On the relationship between truth and liberal politics.Matthew Sleat - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):288 – 305.
Belief Norms & Blindspots.Thomas Raleigh - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):243-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-19

Downloads
353 (#52,005)

6 months
33 (#90,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Huw Price
University of Bonn

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Conceptualization: A Needs-Based Approach.Matthieu Queloz - forthcoming - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Faultless Disagreement.Max Kolbel - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):53-73.
The Points of Concepts: Their Types, Tensions, and Connections.Matthieu Queloz - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (8):1122-1145.
Constructivism and Three Forms of Perspective‐Dependence in Metaethics 1.Karl Schafer - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):68-101.

View all 65 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The status of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):157-84.
Facts and the function of truth.Huw Price - 1988 - New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
Is truth a goal of enquiry? Davidson vs. Wright.Richard Rorty - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (180):281-300.
Naturalism without representationalism.Huw Price - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 71--88.
Philosophy of Logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.

View all 13 references / Add more references