David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2004)
The Law of Non-Contradiction - that no contradiction can be true - has been a seemingly unassailable dogma since the work of Aristotle, in Book G of the Metaphysics. It is an assumption challenged from a variety of angles in this collection of original papers. Twenty-three of the world's leading experts investigate the 'law', considering arguments for and against it and discussing methodological issues that arise whenever we question the legitimacy of logical principles. The result is a balanced inquiry into a venerable principle of logic, one that raises questions at the very centre of logic itself. The aim of this volume is to present a comprehensive debate about the Law of Non-Contradiction, from discussions as to how the law is to be understood, to reasons for accepting or re-thinking the law, and to issues that raise challenges to the law, such as the Liar Paradox, and a 'dialetheic' resolution of that paradox. The editors contribute an introduction which surveys the issues and serves to frame the debate, and a useful bibliography offering a guide to further reading. This volume will be of interest to anyone working on philosophical logic, and to anyone who has ever wondered about the status of logical laws and about how one might proceed to mount arguments for or against them.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$76.50 used (44% off) $118.80 new (21% off) $123.49 direct from Amazon (18% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BC199.C6.L38 2004|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Laurence Goldstein, The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and More: A Defence of a Wittgensteinian Conception of Contradiction.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Weaver (2009). Explanation, Entailment, and Leibnizian Cosmological Arguments. Metaphysica 10 (1):97-108.
Frederick Kroon (2011). Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Philosophy Compass 6 (11):786-803.
Phil Serchuk, Ian Hargreaves & Richard Zach (2011). Vagueness, Logic and Use: Four Experimental Studies on Vagueness. Mind and Language 26 (5):540-573.
Tommaso Piazza & Francesco Piazza (2010). On Inconsistent Entities. A Reply to Colyvan. Philosophical Studies 150 (2):301 - 311.
Bradley Armour-Garb & Graham Priest (2005). Analetheism: A Pyrrhic Victory. Analysis 65 (286):167–173.
Similar books and articles
Laurence Goldstein (2004). The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and More: A Defence of a Wittgensteinian Conception of Contradiction. In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The law of non-contradiction: new philosophical essays. Oxford University Press. 295--313.
Burkhard Tuschling (1988). Consistency and Contradiction. Philosophy and Theology 2 (4):327-361.
Roy Cook (2005). Review of Graham Priest, JC Beall, Bradley Armour-Garb (Eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
Francesco Berto (2007). How to Sell a Contradiction. College Publications.
Xinyan Jiang (1992). The Law of Non‐Contradiction and Chinese Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):1-14.
Graham Stevens (2006). The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays Edited by Graham Priest, J.C. Beall and Bradley Armour-Garb. Philosophical Books 47 (3):273-275.
Venanzio Raspa (1999). Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Francesco Berto (2006). Meaning, Metaphysics, and Contradiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):283-297.
Greg Restall (2006). Laws of Non-Contradiction, Laws of the Excluded Middle, and Logics. In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2009). The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle. Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #26,661 of 1,099,731 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #23,891 of 1,099,731 )
How can I increase my downloads?