David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):397-422 (2002)
Levinas distances himself from Kierkegaardian analyses by suggesting that It is not I who resist the system, as Kierkegaard thought; it is the other. This seems an obvious misreading of Kierkegaard. Resistance, for Kierkegaard, never legitimately arises from the I, but from a God-relationship that breaks through the sphere of immanence and disturbs the system. But, for Levinas it is problematic to suggest a God-relationship distinct from interhuman relationships. Transcendent interhuman relations, Levinas contends, give theological concepts [their] sole signification. Yet, similarities in their accounts of ethical subjectivity and conscience may tempt one to suggest, as a recent commentator does, that appropriation of the Kierkegaardian framework by Levinas is problematic insofar as it is misapplied to interhuman relationships... .; I resist this understanding of the problem. Levinas is not only concerned with denying the interlocutor (i.e., God) in Kierkegaard's description of the transcendent awareness that grounds conscience. Levinas also questions the nature of interlocution implied by Kierkegaard. Levinas' criticisms of Kierkegaard set an important agenda for the study of Kierkegaard by demanding that one address the difficulties that the problematics of hearing raise for Kierkegaard's account of conscientious subjectivity. His challenge could profoundly affect and, in my opinion, enrich the Kierkegaardian account.
|Keywords||Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy of Man Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Dudiak (2001). The Intrigue of Ethics: A Reading of the Idea of Discourse in the Thought of Emmanuel Lévinas. Fordham University Press.
Brian Treanor (2001). God and the Other Person. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:313-324.
Claudia Welz & Karl Verstrynge (eds.) (2008). Despite Oneself: Subjectivity and its Secret in Kierkegaard and Levinas. Turnshare.
James M. McLachlan (2011). Beyond the Self, Beyond Ontology: Levinas' Reading of Shestov's Reading of Kierkegaard. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):179-196.
Rudi Visker (2008). The Inhuman Condition: Looking for Difference After Levinas and Heidegger. Duquesne University Press.
Jeffrey Hanson (2010). Returning (to) the Gift of Death: Violence and History in Derrida and Levinas. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (1):1 - 15.
Merold Westphal (2008). The Many Faces of Levinas as a Reader of Kierkegaard. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (2/4):1141 - 1162.
Daniel Murphy (2007). Levinas and Kierkegaard on Divine Transcendence and Ethical Life: Response to Donald L. Turner and Ford Turrell's “The Non-Existent God”. [REVIEW] Philosophia 35 (3-4):383-385.
Eric S. Nelson (2008). The Secular, the Religious, and the Ethical in Kierkegaard and Levinas. In Claudia Welz & Karl Verstrynge (eds.), Despite Oneself: Subjectivity and its Secret in Kierkegaard and Levinas. Turnshare 91--109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads225 ( #12,332 of 1,911,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)64 ( #7,866 of 1,911,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?