David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 119 (4):449–495 (2010)
In “The Paralogisms of Pure Reason” Kant seeks to explain how rationalist philosophers could have arrived at the dogmatic conclusion that the self is a substance. His diagnosis has two components: first, the positing of “Transcendental Illusion”—a pervasive intellectual illusion that predisposes us to accept as sound certain unsound arguments for substantive theses about the nature of the self; second, the identification of the relevant fallacy we commit when we succumb to this illusion. This paper explains how these two elements combine to produce the doctrine that the self is a substance. It is argued that Kant has a novel, ingenious—and even somewhat plausible—account of how the rational psychologist might arrive at this view-- one that involves identifying a fundamental confusion about the nature of conceivability.
|Keywords||Kant Paralogism self Transcendental Illusion substance soul rational metaphysics speculative metaphysics Dialectic Critique of Pure Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Steven Tester (2016). Mental Powers and the Soul in Kant’s Subjective Deduction and the Second Paralogism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):426-452.
Christopher Peacocke (2012). First Person Illusions: Are They Descartes', or Kant's? Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):247-275.
Similar books and articles
Corey W. Dyck (2014). Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford University Press.
James G. Anderson (1980). Kant's Paralogism of Personhood. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10:73-86.
Mark Pickering (2011). The Systematic Unity of Nature as a Transcendental Illusion. Kantian Review 16 (3):429-448.
Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). Do Principles of Reason Have Objective but Indeterminate Validity? Kant-Studien 95 (4):405-425.
Colin Marshall (2010). Kant's Metaphysics of the Self. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (8):1-21.
Michelle Grier (2001). Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Michelle Grier (1993). Illusion and Fallacy in Kant's First Paralogism. Kant-Studien 84 (3):257-282.
Ted Kinnaman (2002). Epistemology and Ontology In Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 32 (3):203-220.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Corey W. Dyck (2010). The Aeneas Argument: Personality and Immortality in Kant's Third Paralogism. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):95-122.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1974). Kant's Dialectic. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Lara Ostaric (2009). Kant's Account of Nature's Systematicity and the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Inquiry 52 (2):155 – 178.
James Van Cleve (1999). Problems From Kant. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-10-29
Total downloads232 ( #12,429 of 1,934,638 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #33,858 of 1,934,638 )
How can I increase my downloads?