David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this essay I’d like to help readers prepare to learn from Gilles Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition.1 Such an essay is needed, as truer words were never spoken than when Deleuze said of it in his "Letter to a Harsh Critic": "it's still full of academic elements, it's heavy going"2 Now part of the “academic” aspect of the work comes from Deleuze having submitted Difference and Repetition to his jury as the primary thesis for the doctorat d'Etat in 1968.3 But that doesn’t lessen the need for help when first approaching the book. The context of Deleuze’s remarks in his “Letter” should be noted: he has just been noting that "the history of philosophy plays a patently repressive role in philosophy, it's philosophy's own version of the Oedipus complex."4 Deleuze continues that he tried to subvert this repressive function by various means. First, by writing on authors such as Lucretius, Hume, Spinoza and Nietzsche who contested the rationalist tradition by the "critique of negativity, the cultivation of joy, the hatred of interiority, the externality of forces and relations, the denunciation of power [pouvoir]." Second, and quite notoriously, by “a sort of buggery [enculage] or (it comes to the same thing) immaculate conception.” That is, by making the author say something in their own words that would be “monstrous.”5 These are famous lines, and the last is certainly amusing in an épater les bourgeois sort of way. But what's really important in my view comes next, when Deleuze explains what it means to finally write "in your own name," as he claims he first did in Difference and Repetition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel W. Smith (2009). Deleuze's Concept of the Virtual and the Critique of the Possible. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (9):34-43.
Constantin V. Boundas (2011). A Criminal Intrigue: An Interview with Jean-Clet Martin. Deleuze Studies 5 (supplement):116-147.
John Protevi (2005). Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition. Teaching Philosophy 28 (3):296-298.
Kir Kuiken (2005). Deleuze/Derrida: Towards an Almost Imperceptible Difference. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):290-310.
Philip Turetzky (2009). The Logic of Expression: Quality, Quantity and Intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze, by Simon Duffy. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):341-345.
Simon B. Duffy (2004). Schizo-Math: The Logic of Different/Ciation and the Philosophy of Difference. Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.
John Protevi (2010). An Approach to Difference and Repetition. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):35-43.
Eugene Brently Young (2008). The Determination of Sense Via Deleuze and Blanchot: Paradoxes of the Habitual, the Immemorial, and the Eternal Return. Deleuze Studies 2 (2):155-177.
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
Gordon C. F. Bearn (2000). Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):441-465.
Added to index2010-07-12
Total downloads55 ( #86,814 of 1,940,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,940 of 1,940,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?