Graduate studies at Western
European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):106–126 (2004)
|Abstract||The *Tractatus* contains an argument that there are simple, necessarily existent objects, which, being simple, are suited to be the referents of the names occuring in the final analysis of propositions. The argument is perplexing in its own right, but also for its invocation of the notion of "substance". I argue that if one locates Wittgenstein's conception of substance in the Kantian tradition to which his talk of "substance" alludes, what emerges is an argument that is very nearly--but not quite--cogent.|
|Keywords||substance name logically proper name singular proposition direct reference simples modal metaphysics Wittgenstein Tractatus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Swinburne (2009). Substance Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):501 - 513.
Andrej Krause (2006). Are Bolzano's Substances Simple? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.
Patrick Toner (2010). On Substance. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):25-48.
Joshua Hoffman (1994). Substance Among Other Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel von Wachter (2007). God as Substance Without Substance Ontology. In Christian Kanzian & Muhammed Legenhausen (eds.), Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Penelope Mackie (2011). Property Dualism and Substance Dualism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):181-199.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads164 ( #2,800 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #4,181 of 754,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?