A gödelian ontological argument improved

Religious Studies 45 (3):347-353 (2009)
Gödel's ontological argument is a formal argument for a being defined in terms of the concept of a positive property. I shall defend several versions of Gödel's argument, using weaker premises than Anderson's (1990) version, and avoiding Oppy's (1996 and 2000) parody refutations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/27750023
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Graham Oppy (2009). Pruss's Ontological Arguments. Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

94 ( #28,799 of 1,725,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.