David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):616-617 (2003)
The target article is based upon the principle that complex mental phenomena result from the interactions among some elementary entities. Connectionist nodes and ACT-R's production rules can be considered as such entities. However, before testing against Newell's macro-criteria, self-organizing models must be tested against criteria relating to the properties of their elementary entities. When such micro-criteria are considered, they separate connectionism from ACT-R and the comparison of these theories against Newell's Tests is hardly correct.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wayne D. Gray, Michael J. Schoelles & Christopher W. Myers (2003). Meeting Newell's Other Challenge: Cognitive Architectures as the Basis for Cognitive Engineering. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):609-610.
Gerard O'Brien (1998). Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content. Acta Analytica 22 (22):111-31.
Paul F. M. J. Verschure (2003). Real-World Behavior as a Constraint on the Cognitive Architecture: Comparing ACT-R and DAC in the Newell Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):624-626.
Gerard O'Brien (1989). Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content. Acta Analytica 22 (22):111-31.
Stephen Grossberg (2003). Bring ART Into the ACT. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):610-611.
Daniel C. Dennett (1991). Mother Nature Versus the Walking Encyclopedia. In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum. 21--30.
Ron Sun (2003). Conceptions and Misconceptions of Connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-621.
John R. Anderson & Christian Lebiere (2003). Optimism for the Future of Unified Theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):628-633.
Claire F. O'Loughlin & Annette Karmiloff-Smith (2003). Evaluating Connectionism: A Developmental Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):614-615.
John R. Anderson & Christian Lebiere (2003). The Newell Test for a Theory of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):587-601.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #302,819 of 1,099,719 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?