Faith, paradox, reason and the argumentum spiritus sancti in climacus and Kierkegaard
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The pseudonymous author of this article argues that neither Kierkegaard nor Climacus in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript are claiming that Christian beliefs are nonsense or contradictory, but that it is contrary to universal epistemic norms to believe these beliefs or even to believe they can be believed. In an appendix for which the rest of the article is a preparation the author gives an interpretation of the pseudonymity and form-content contradiction and of how Kierkegaard in a sense agrees with all the assertions made in the Postscript. If Kierkegaard is right, this article could only have been written pseudonymously.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vanessa Rumble (1995). To Be as No-One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Søren Kierkegaard (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Princeton University Press.
Jack Mulder Jr (2002). Re-Radicalizing Kierkegaard: An Alternative to Religiousness C in Light of an Investigation Into the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):303-324.
Jack Mulder (2002). Re-Radicalizing Kierkegaard: An Alternative to Religiousness C in Light of an Investigation Into the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):303-324.
John Lippitt (1997). A Funny Thing Happened to Me on the Way to Salvation: Climacus as Humorist in Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Religious Studies 33 (2):181-202.
Paul Muench (2010). Kierkegaard's Socratic Pseudonym: A Profile of Johannes Climacus. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Jacob Howland (2006). Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Kristy Vipperman (1999). Climacus the (Multi-Dimensional) Humorist: Interpreting ‘an Understanding with the Reader’. Religious Studies 35 (3):347-362.
George B. Connell (2009). Kierkegaard and Confucius: The Religious Dimensions of Ethical Selfhood. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):133-149.
Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.) (2010). Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #65,921 of 1,096,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #246,097 of 1,096,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?