I Was Once a Fetus: That is Why Abortion is Wrong
|Abstract||Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I am going to give an argument showing that abortion is wrong in exactly the same circumstances in which it is wrong to kill an adult.Â To argue further that abortion is always wrong would require showing that it is always wrong to kill an adult or that the circumstances in which it is not wrong--say, capital punishment--never befall a fetus.Â Such an argument will be beyond the scope of this paper, but since it is uncontroversial that it is wrong to kill an adult human being for the sorts of reasons for which most abortions are performed, it follows that most abortions are wrong. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The argument has three parts, of decreasing difficulty.Â The most difficult will be the first part where I will argue that I was once a fetus and before that I was an embryo.Â This argument will rest on simple considerations of the metaphysics of identity.Â The next part of the argument will be to show that it would have been at least as wrong to have killed me before I was born as it would be to kill me now.Â I will argue for this in more than one way, but the guiding intuition is clear: if you kill me earlier, the victim is the same but the harm is greater since I am deprived of more the earlier I die.Â Finally, the easiest part of the argument will be that I am not relevantly different from anybody else and the fetus which I was was not relevantly different from any other human fetus, and so the argument applies equally well to all fetuses. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The advantage of this argument over others is that it avoids talking of personhood, except in one of the independent arguments in part 2.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
C. Strong (2008). A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Nathan Nobis, Why Francis Beckwith's Case Against Abortion Fails (and Metaphysics Remains Irrelevant to Abortion).
Robert P. Lovering (2005). Does a Normal Foetus Really Have a Future of Value? A Reply to Marquis. Bioethics 19 (2):131–145.
Patrick A. Tully (2005). Victims of Abortion and “Victims” of Contraception. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:383-398.
Phil Gosselin (2000). Can the Potentiality Argument Survive the Contraception Reduction? Journal of Philosophical Research 25:437-458.
F. M. Kamm (1992). Creation and Abortion: A Study in Moral and Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Ezio Di Nucci (forthcoming). Fathers and Abortion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.
Kristen Hine (2013). How to Understand a Woman's Obligations to the Fetus in Unwanted Pregnancies. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):239-247.
N. Nobis (2011). Abortion, Metaphysics and Morality: A Review of Francis Beckwith's Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):261-273.
Habib Ahmad Sajid Ul-Ghafoor & Muhammad Ilyas Mukhtar Alam (2010). Abortion and Protection of the Human Fetus: Religious and Legal Problems in Pakistan. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 15 (2):55-59.
Ingmar Persson (2004). Two Act-Omission Paradoxes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):147–162.
James Lindemann Nelson (2000). Prenatal Diagnosis, Personal Identity, and Disability. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):213-228.
Andrew J. Peach (2005). A Natural Response to Boonin. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads73 ( #14,013 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?