Possibility is not consistency

Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2341-2348 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We shall use Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem to show that consistency is not possibility, and then argue that the argument does serious damage to some theories of modality where consistency plays a major but not exclusive role

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Herbrand consistency of some arithmetical theories.Saeed Salehi - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (3):807-827.
On the philosophical relevance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
On Herbrand consistency in weak arithmetic.Zofia Adamowicz & Paweł Zbierski - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (6):399-413.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-27

Downloads
174 (#106,822)

6 months
18 (#119,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University

References found in this work

Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism.Hartry H. Field - 1980 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Being known.Christopher Peacocke - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What we disagree about when we disagree about ontology.Cian Dorr - 2005 - In Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 234--86.
Fixing Frege.John P. Burgess - 2005 - Princeton University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references