Prophecy without middle knowledge
Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):433-457 (2007)
| Abstract | While it might seem prima facie plausible that divine foreknowledge is all that is needed for prophecy, this seems incorrect. To issue a prophecy, God hasto know not just how someone will act, but how someone would act were the prophecy issued. This makes some think that Middle Knowledge is required.I argue that Thomas Flint’s two Middle Knowledge based accounts of prophecy are unsatisfactory, but one of them can be repaired. However the resources needed for repair also yield a sketch of a foreknowledge-only account of prophecy. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Mark Van Vugt (2001). Self-Interest as Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):429-430.
Jill Graper Hernandez (2005). Divine Omniscience and Human Evil: Interpreting Leibniz Without Middle Knowledge. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):107-120.
Roslyn Weiss (2007). Natural Order or Divine Will: Maimonides on Cosmogony and Prophecy. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (1):1-26.
Nancy Levene (2001). Spinoza's Bible. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):93-142.
C. Alonso (1970). The Influence of Prophecy in the Later Middle Ages. Augustinianum 10 (2):407-408.
John J. Fitzgerald (2008). Timeless Troubles. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:203-215.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,732 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |

