The Hume-Edwards principle and the cosmological argument
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):149-165 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlexander R. Pruss (2004). A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 40 (2):165-179.
Graham Oppy (2004). Faulty Reasoning About Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments. Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):242-249.
Claus Beisbart & Tobias Jung (2006). Privileged, Typical, or Not Even That? – Our Place in the World According to the Copernican and the Cosmological Principles. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):225 - 256.
Alexander Pruss (2003). A Response to Almeida and Judisch. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):65-72.
James Franklin (1980). More on Part IX of Hume's Dialogues. Philosophical Quarterly 30 (118):69-71.
Ghislain Guigon (2011). Merely Possible Explanation. Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
James Cain (1995). The Hume-Edwards Principle. Religious Studies 31 (3):323 - 328.
Graham Oppy (2000). On ‘a New Cosmological Argument’. Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
Alexander Pruss (1999). A New Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 35 (4):461 - 476.
William F. Vallicella (1997). The Hume-Edwards Objection to the Cosmological Argument. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:423-443.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads103 ( #5,810 of 549,694 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,694 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
