The ontological argument and the motivational centres of lives

Religious Studies 46 (2):233-249 (2010)
Abstract
Assuming S₅, the main controversial premise in modal ontological arguments is the possibility premise, such as that possibly a maximally great being exists. I shall offer a new way of arguing that the possibility premise is probably true
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,738
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Alexander R. Pruss (2001). Śamkara's Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2):111-120.
Citations of this work BETA
Yujin Nagasawa (2011). Anselmian Theism. Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-04-30

Total downloads

42 ( #39,322 of 1,098,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #57,571 of 1,098,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.