The ontological argument and the motivational centres of lives

Religious Studies 46 (2):233-249 (2010)
Assuming S₅, the main controversial premise in modal ontological arguments is the possibility premise, such as that possibly a maximally great being exists. I shall offer a new way of arguing that the possibility premise is probably true
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/25676939
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Alexander R. Pruss (2001). Śamkara's Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2):111-120.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Yujin Nagasawa (2011). Anselmian Theism. Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

49 ( #68,582 of 1,725,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.