David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Logica 13 (1):218-218 (1962)
The author discusses various concepts of observation statements, subjecting to closer examination that concept according to which an observation statement is a statement with all terms interpreted directly. The logical analysis of direct interpretation, identified with the so called ostensive definition, results in the conclusion that the denotation of predicates is determined by this procedure in a very slight degree. Consequently, observation statements affirming a predicate so interpreted of objects not identical with the standard objects referred to in the ostensive definition cannot be validated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Crispin Wright (1993). Scientific Realism and Observation Statements. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (2):231 – 254.
Alan Schwerin (1984). Semantic Holism and Observation Statements. Philosophical Papers 13 (2):19-27.
David Lewis (1988). Statements Partly About Observation. Philosophical Papers 17 (1):1-31.
Lars Bergström (1994). Quine's Truth. Inquiry 37 (4):421-435.
Lars Bergström (1994). Quine's Truth. Inquiry 37 (4):421 – 435.
Anthony Weston (1996). Self-Validating Reduction: Toward a Theory of Environmental Devaluation. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):115-132.
K. S. Shrader-Frechette (1982). Quark Quantum Numbers and the Problem of Microphysical Observation. Synthese 50 (1):125 - 145.
R. G. Swinburne (1974). Meaningfulness Without Confirmability: A Reply. Analysis 35 (1):22 - 27.
D. G. Ellson (1963). The Scientists' Criterion of True Observation. Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-52.
Willem A. deVries & Paul Coates (2009). Brandom's Two-Ply Error. In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #404,706 of 1,724,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,625 of 1,724,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?