David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):48-58 (1992)
Suggests that genuine discovery in the context of qualitative research implies a distance between what is seen in the phenomenological sense and what has already been described. The ingenuity of William James's descriptions of hitherto undescribed aspects of everyday experience are rooted in an openness to seeing that characterizes his "radical empiricism." James was a pathfinder and explorer who did introspection and discovered the phenomena of transitive consciousness. The concepts of seeing as the mode of discovery, problematics of the intentionality principle, James's radical empiricism, reflection and post-reflective seeing, objectless consciousness and insight, and transforming intentional consciousness are discussed. Buddhist meditative disciplines aimed at the development of insight, rather than altered states of consciousness, offer systematic methods for cultivating this openness and for the facilitation of genuine discovery.
|Keywords||William James Radical empiricism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William James & Ralph Barton Perry (eds.) (1996). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Eugene Taylor & Robert H. Wozniak (1996). Pure Experience: The Response to William James. In E. I. Taylor & R. H. Wozniak (eds.), Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Bristol: Thoemmes Press 338-341.
Otto F. Kraushaar (1939). Lotze as a Factor in the Development of James's Radical Empiricism and Pluralism. Philosophical Review 48 (5):455-471.
John E. Drabinski (1993). Radical Empiricism and Phenomenology: Philosophy and the Pure Stuff of Experience. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (3):226-242.
Jacob L. Goodson (2010). Experience, Reason, and the Virtues: On William James's Reinstatement of the Vague. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):243-258.
John Daniel Wild (1980). The Radical Empiricism of William James. Greenwood Press.
William James (1977). The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition, Including an Annotated Bibliography Updated Through 1977. University of Chicago Press.
William James (1943/1967). Essays in Radical Empiricism [and] a Pluralistic Universe. Gloucester, Mass.,P. Smith.
Robert J. Roth (1998). Radical Pragmatism: An Alternative. Fordham University Press.
Matthew Crippen (2010). William James on Belief: Turning Darwinism Against Empiricistic Skepticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):477-502.
William James (1905). Is Radical Empiricism Solipsistic? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (9):235-238.
Paul Tibbetts (1971). The Radical Empiricism of William James. New Scholasticism 45 (1):168-172.
William James (1906). Mr. Pitkin's Refutation of `Radical Empiricism'. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (26):712.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads21 ( #137,372 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?