How Can the Grand Metaphysical Questions of the (Christian-)Metaphysical Tradition Be Re-thought Today?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:83-91 (2004)
The necessary task for philosophy is the development of a metaphysical ontology, i.e., a philosophical theory of everything. The urgency of this task is apparentin, for example, the weakness of proofs for the existence of God. When such “proofs” are not rooted in a comprehensive metaphysical ontology, the principlesapplied, as well as the “God” whose existence has supposedly been proven, are unintelligible. Thus, the explication of Being, from within an adequately articulated framework, should be the central focus of philosophy. The basic conceptual structures required for this task are the three fundamental modalities: necessity, possibility, and contingency. With these tools, we can refute the thesis that everything is contingent and nothing is necessary or absolute. The all-is-contingent thesis has as an implication the assumption of the possibility of absolute nothingness. But this concept both is itself contradictory and has an impossible consequence. Finally, the relation between the absolute dimension of being and persons like us (contingent beings) can be understood by conceiving of the absolute dimension as a personal absolute. From here, we can attempt to interpret the history of the free acts of the personal absolute by studying the history of revealed religions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pietro Antonio Ferrisi (2011). Creazione dal nulla. Esegesi metafisica di Agostino a Gen. 1,1-2. Augustinianum 51 (1):123-146.
Lorenz B. Puntel (2011). Being and God: A Systematic Approach in Confrontation with Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jean-Luc Marion. Northwestern University Press.
Ross P. Cameron (2006). Much Ado About Nothing: A Study of Metaphysical Nihilism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 64 (2):193-222.
Bradford Skow (2010). Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):851 - 858.
Yann Schmitt (2013). The Deadlock of Absolute Divine Simplicity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Leszek Kołakowski (2001). Metaphysical Horror. University of Chicago Press.
Daniel Nolan (2011). The Extent of Metaphysical Necessity. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
J. N. Findlay (1970). Ascent to the Absolute: Metaphysical Papers and Lectures. London,Allen & Unwin.
Jon McGinnis (2011). The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary. In The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Cath Univ Amer Pr.
Tadeusz Szubka (2006). The Metaphysical Realism Debate: What is at Stake? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):301-316.
Jeffrey Wilson (2000). Metaphysical Questions in Sartre's Phenomenological Ontology. Sartre Studies International 6 (2):46-61.
Daniel Haynes (2011). The Metaphysics of Christian Ethics: Radical Orthodoxy and Theosis. Heythrop Journal 52 (4):659-671.
Kelly A. Parker, Josiah Royce. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Theresa Sanders (1994). Rest for the Restless? Philosophy and Theology 8 (4):347-362.
Mark Balaguer (2009). The Metaphysical Irrelevance of the Compatibilism Debate (and, More Generally, of Conceptual Analysis). Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):1-24.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads81 ( #13,096 of 1,088,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)36 ( #2,138 of 1,088,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?