Sphere Pluralism and Critical Individuality
Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (1):21-39 (2004)
| Abstract | While discussing critical individuality as oneof the main goals of liberal education, theemphasis has usually been on direct educationalmeasures. Much less attention has been given tothe social preconditions for its development.This paper discusses the societal aspect of thequestion by employing the notion of spherepluralism. The attempt is to point out someways in which the diversified nature of societycan be employed in its full potential for thedevelopment of critical individuality. Thearticle aims to outline a form of spherepluralism, which is based on structuraldifferentiation, cultural diversity, communalvitality, confessional pluralism andcross-communal criticism. The suggestion isthat the critical potential of sphere pluralismpresupposes a proper balance between sphereautonomy and inter-sphere criticism as well asthat between social construction of meaning andobjective-structural constraints | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
James Bohman (1999). Theories, Practices, and Pluralism: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480.
Hans-Georg Moeller (2004). New Confucianism and the Semantics of Individuality. A Luhmannian Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):25 – 39.
David Randall (2011). The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
D. Ginev (2003). The Pluralistic Public Sphere From an Ontological Point of View. Critical Horizons 4 (1):75-97.
Michael Rabinder James (1999). Tribal Sovereignty and the Intercultural Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (5):57-86.
Marc Ereshefsky & Makmiller Pedroso (2013). Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms. Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):331-349.
Mauro Dorato & Matteo Morganti (2013). Grades of Individuality. A Pluralistic View of Identity in Quantum Mechanics and in the Sciences. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):591-610.
Brandon Cooke (2002). Critical Pluralism Unmasked. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):296-309.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Claudio Corradetti (2011). Transitional Justice and the Truth-Constraints of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7).
Matteo Morganti (2008). Identity, Individuality and Indiscernibility. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:167-173.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Paulina Sztabińska (2007). Individuality and the Common Cause in the Sphere of Public Art. Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts 9:107-122.
Sue Thomas (2004). Reconfiguring the Public Sphere: Implications for Analyses of Educational Policy. British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (3):228 - 248.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

