Referential Usage and Gödelian Completions
The Reasoner 1 (6):5-6 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPanu Raatikainen (2002). McCall's Gödelian Argument is Invalid. Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.
Genoveva Marti (2008). Direct Reference and Definite Descriptions. Dialectica 62 (1):43–57.
Srećko Kovač (2003). Some Weakened Gödelian Ontological Systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (6):565-588.
Andrew Arana (2001). Solovay's Theorem Cannot Be Simplified. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 112.
Terrence Millar (1995). Model Completions and Omitting Types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):654-672.
Hélène Lejeune (2000). Paires Élémentaires de Corps Pseudo-Finis: Dénombrement Des Complétions (Elementary Pairs of Pseudo-Finite Fields: Counting Completions). Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):705-718.
Hiroakira Ono (2012). Crawley Completions of Residuated Lattices and Algebraic Completeness of Substructural Predicate Logics. Studia Logica 100 (1-2):339-359.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-10-03Total downloads18 ( #67,643 of 549,700 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,700 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
