David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:135-170 (2012)
In the texts of the middle years (roughly, the 1680s and 90s), Leibniz appears to endorse two incompatible approaches to motion, one a realist approach, the other a phenomenalist approach. I argue that once we attend to certain nuances in his account we can see that in fact he has only one, coherent approach to motion during this period. I conclude by considering whether the view of motion I want to impute to Leibniz during his middle years ranks as a kind of realism or rather as some kind of phenomenalism or idealism.
|Keywords||Leibniz motion realism phenomenalism idealism force equivalence of hypotheses|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Merrihew Adams (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Garber (2009). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford University Press.
Donald Rutherford (2008). Leibniz as Idealist. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4:141-90.
Samuel Levey (2005). Leibniz on Precise Shapes and the Corporeal World. In Donald Rutherford J. A. Cover (ed.), Leibniz: Nature and Freedom. Oxford University Press 69--94.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Puryear (2013). Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2):319-346.
Similar books and articles
Anja Jauernig (2008). Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypotheses. The Leibniz Review 18:1-40.
Anja Jauernig (2009). Leibniz on Motion – Reply to Edward Slowik. The Leibniz Review 19:139-147.
John T. Roberts (2003). Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Paul Lodge (2005). Garber's Interpretations of Leibniz on Corporeal Substance in the 'Middle Years'. The Leibniz Review 15:1-26.
Brandon C. Look (2010). Leibniz's Metaphysics and Metametaphysics: Idealism, Realism, and the Nature of Substance. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):871-879.
Tamar Levanon (2010). A Reply to Anja Jauernig's Article, 'Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypothesis,' The Leibniz Review, Vol. 18, 2008. The Leibniz Review 20:139-150.
Nicholas Stang (forthcoming). Bodies, Matter, Monads and Things in Themselves. In Brandon Look (ed.), Leibniz and Kant.
Christoph Hoerl (2015). Seeing Motion and Apparent Motion. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):676-702.
Paul Lodge (2001). The Debate Over Extended Substance in Leibniz's Correspondence with de Volder. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):155 – 165.
Marius Stan (2009). Kant's Early Theory of Motion. The Leibniz Review 19:29-61.
Richard Arthur (1994). Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Daniel Garber (2004). Leibniz on Body, Matter and Extension. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):23–40.
Richard Arthur (2007). Beeckman, Descartes and the Force of Motion. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):1--28.
Added to index2011-04-13
Total downloads35 ( #124,215 of 1,938,769 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #84,040 of 1,938,769 )
How can I increase my downloads?