Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Jack Pustilnik (1965). Austin on Some Problems of Perception. Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.
Similar books and articles
Some of Austin's general statements about the doctrines of sense-datum philosophy are reviewed. It is concluded that Austin thought that in these doctrines "directly see" is given a new but inadequately explained and defined use. Were this so, the philosophical use of "directly see" would lack a definite sense and this would correspondingly affect the doctrines. They would lack definite truth-value. Against this, it is argued that the philosopher's use of "directly see" does not support Austin's general thesis that the sense-datum doctrines lack truth-value.
As our chief aim is a comprehensive theory of perception which will cover all
the facts, ... JR Smythies' Analysis of Perception I discuss in Ch. VI, ยง 6. ...
Patrick Suppes'' set-theoretical approach to the analysis of theories, and Joseph D. Sneed''s metatheory are briefly outlined. The notions of observation, illusion and hallucination are reconstructed according to these approaches. It is argued that the terms perception and truth are theoretical with respect to observation but nontheoretical with respect to illusion and hallucination. Hallucination is construed as a special kind of illusion.
Discussion of Jack Pustilnik, Austin on some problems of perception
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

