Skepticism, Reason and Reidianism
In Albert Casullo & Joshua Thurow (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
| Abstract | The traditional problems of epistemology have often been thought to be properly solved only by the provision of an argument, with premises justified by rational intuition and introspection, for the probable truth of our beliefs in the problematic domains. Following the lead of Thomas Reid, a sizable number of contemporary epistemologists, including many proponents of so-called "Reformed epistemology" regarding religious belief, reject as arbitrary the preferential treatment of reason and introspection implicit in the traditional view of the problems. These "Reidians" insist that the traditional problems cannot be solved in the expected manner, but they go on to suggest that this result is of little significance because similar skeptical questions can be raised regarding a priori and introspective justification. After making clear the significance of the Reidian objection, I endeavor to defend the traditional preference for rational intuition over our other sources of belief by demonstrating that the usual skeptical worries cannot be equally raised against a priori justification. Then, after a brief consideration of some unduly neglected passages in Reid's writings in which he appears to concede that the traditional partiality to reason and introspection is not, in fact, arbitrary, I argue that it is the Reidians who are guilty of arbitrary partiality. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDylan Dodd (2012). Evidentialism and Skeptical Arguments. Synthese 189 (2):337-352.
James Beebe (2008). BonJour's Arguments Against Skepticism About the "a Priori". Philosophical Studies 137 (2):243 - 267.
Baron Reed (2009). A New Argument for Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):91 - 104.
Peter Byrne (2011). Reidianism in Contemporary English-Speaking Religious Epistemology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):267 - 284.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1986). Skepticism About Practical Reason. Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25.
Denis G. Arnold (1997). Introspection and its Objects. Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (April):87-94.
Nicholas Silins (forthcoming). Introspection and Inference. Philosophical Studies.
Joel Pust (2000). Intuitions as Evidence. Routledge.
Steven Luper-Foy (1988). The Knower, Inside and Out. Synthese 74 (3):349-67.
Roger White (2006). Problems for Dogmatism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):525--57.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (forthcoming). Truth as the Aim of Epistemic Justification. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Greco (2012). The Impossibility of Skepticism. Philosophical Review 121 (3):317-358.
Robert J. Fogelin (2003). Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-08-16Total downloads26 ( #48,417 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
