Warrant and analysis
Analysis 60 (1):51–57 (2000)
| Abstract | Alvin Plantinga theorizes about an epistemic property he calls "warrant," defined as that which makes the difference "between knowledge and mere true belief." I show that, given this account, Plantinga can have no justification for claiming that a false belief is warranted nor for claiming that warrant comes in degrees. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Warrant Plantinga, A | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTrenton Merricks (1997). More on Warrant's Entailing Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):627-631.
Margherita di Stasio (2006). On Plantinga's Idea of Warrant in Epistemology and in Philosophy of Religion. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):307-325.
Andrew M. Bailey (2010). Warrant is Unique. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):297-304.
T. M. Botham (2003). Plantinga and Favorable Mini-Environments. Synthese 135 (3):431 - 441.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Plantinga on Warrant. Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.
Alvin Plantinga (1993). Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Moon (2012). Warrant Does Entail Truth. Synthese 184 (3):287-297.
Alvin Plantinga (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads25 ( #49,684 of 549,724 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,724 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
