Reply to two realists
Journal of Philosophy 79 (10):575-577 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTimothy D. Lyons (2003). Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):891-901.
David Enoch (2010). The Epistemological Challenge to Metanormative Realism: How Best to Understand It, and How to Cope with It. Philosophical Studies 148 (3):413--438.
P. Bloomfield (2007). Two Dogmas of Metaethics. Philosophical Studies 132 (3):439 - 466.
Folke Tersman (1995). Non-Cognitivism and Inconsistency. Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):361-372.
Alan Musgrave (1992). Realism About What? Philosophy of Science 59 (4):691-697.
Jon Tresan (forthcoming). Question Authority: In Defense of Moral Naturalism Without Clout. Philosophical Studies.
Ioannis Votsis (forthcoming). Structural Realism: Continuity and its Limits. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads24 ( #51,719 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
