Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):746-747 (2004)
|Abstract||Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) fail to address several problems with commitment theory as it relates to non-kin altruism in religious contexts. They (1) provide little support for the contention that religious sacrifices function as signals, (2) do not distinguish between religious specialists and lay believers, and (3) conflate definitions of cooperation and sacrifice.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Gurven (2004). Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Hector N. Qirko (2009). Altruism in Suicide Terror Organizations. Zygon 44 (2):289-322.
Harvey Whitehouse (2004). Locating the Causes of Religious Commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):752-753.
Hector Qirko (2004). Altruistic Celibacy, Kin-Cue Manipulation, and The Development of Religious Institutions. Zygon 39 (3):681-706.
John Teehan (2010). In the Name of God: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Ethics and Violence. Wiley-Blackwell.
Avi Sagi (1999). Religious Pluralism Assessed. Sophia 38 (2):93-115.
Anthony J. Godzieba (1997). III. God and Self in Terrence Tilley's, The Wisdom of Religious Commitment. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):79-91.
Elliott Sober (1992). The Evolution of Altruism: Correlation, Cost, and Benefit. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):177-187.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,629 of 722,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?