David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):104-111 (2012)
Context: the position of pure and applied mathematics in the epistemic conflict between realism and relativism. Problem: To investigate the change in the status of mathematical knowledge over historical time: specifically, the shift from a realist epistemology to a relativist epistemology. Method: Two examples are discussed: geometry and number theory. It is demonstrated how the initially realist epistemic framework – with mathematics situated in a platonic ideal reality from where it governs our physical world – became untenable, with the advent of non-Euclidean geometry and the increasing abstraction of the number concept. Results: Radical constructivism offers an alternative relativist epistemology, where mathematical knowledge is constructed by the individual knower in a context of an axiomatic base and subject items chosen at her discretion, for the purpose of modelling some part of her personal experiential world. Thus it can be expedient to view the practice of mathematics as a game, played by mathematicians according to agreed-upon rules. Constructivist content: The role played by constructivism in the formulation of mathematics is discussed. This is illustrated by the historical transition from a classical (platonic) view of mathematics, as having an objective existence of its own in the “realm of ideal forms,” to the now widely accepted modern view where one has a wide freedom to construct mathematical theories to model various parts of one’s experiential world
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
B. Kerkhove & J. P. Bendegem (2012). The Many Faces of Mathematical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):97-103.
Janet Folina (1994). Poincaré's Conception of the Objectivity of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (3):202-227.
J. Confrey (2011). The Transformational Epistemology of Radical Constructivism: A Tribute to Ernst von Glasersfeld. Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):177-182.
A. Scholl (2012). Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann's Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):5-12.
J. Frans (2012). The Game of Fictional Mathematics: Review of M. Leng, Mathematics and Reality. [REVIEW] Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):126-128.
David Sepkoski (2007). Nominalism and Constructivism in Seventeenth-Century Mathematical Philosophy. Routledge.
Christian Hennig (2010). Mathematical Models and Reality: A Constructivist Perspective. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (1):29-48.
Paola Cantù (2010). Grassmann’s Epistemology: Multiplication and Constructivism. In Hans-Joachim Petsche (ed.), From Past to Future: Graßmann's Work in Context.
Stojan Obradović & Slobodan Ninković (2009). The Heuristic Function of Mathematics in Physics and Astronomy. Foundations of Science 14 (4):351-360.
Tom Rockmore (2006). Hegel and Epistemological Constructivism. Idealistic Studies 36 (3):183-190.
Chris Pincock (2007). A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences. Noûs 41 (2):253-275.
Andrei Rodin (2010). How Mathematical Concepts Get Their Bodies. Topoi 29 (1):53-60.
Daniel Chlastawa (2010). Trzy argumenty przeciwko konstruktywizmowi matematycznemu. Filozofia Nauki 4.
B. Poerksen (2010). Provocations of an Epistemology. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):40-50.
Added to index2012-03-14
Total downloads13 ( #272,041 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?