David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381 (1999)
: Debates on precedent autonomy and some forms of paternalistic interventions, which are related to questions of personal identity, are analyzed. The discussion is based on the distinction between personal identity as persistence and as biographical identity. It first is shown that categorical objections to advance directives and "Ulysses contracts" are based on false assumptions about personal identity that conflate persistence and biographical identity. Therefore, advance directives and "Ulysses contracts" are ethically acceptable tools for prolonging one's autonomy. The notions of personality and biographical identity are used to analyze the ethically relevant features. Thereby, it is shown that these concepts are operative in and useful for thinking in biomedical ethics. The overall conclusion is that categorical arguments against precedent autonomy or "Ulysses contracts" are based on misleading theories of personal identity and that advance directives are an ethically respectable tool for prolonging individuals' autonomy in cases of dementia and mental illness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Buford (2008). Advancing an Advance Directive Debate. Bioethics 22 (8):423-430.
Chrisoula Andreou (2008). Making a Clean Break: Addiction and Ulysses Contracts. Bioethics 22 (1):25–31.
Giovanni Boniolo (2013). Is an Account of Identity Necessary for Bioethics? What Post-Genomic Biomedicine Can Teach Us. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):401-411.
Phil Bielby (2012). Ulysses Arrangements in Psychiatric Treatment: Towards Proposals for Their Use Based on 'Sharing' Legal Capacity. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (2):1-29.
Similar books and articles
Michael Quante (2007). The Social Nature of Personal Identity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):56-76.
Debra J. H. Mathews, Hilary Bok & Peter V. Rabins (eds.) (2009). Personal Identity and Fractured Selves: Perspectives From Philosophy, Ethics, and Neuroscience. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jennifer Radden (2004). Identity: Personal Identity, Characterization Identity, and Mental Disorder. In , The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133--46.
Helga Kuhse (1999). Some Reflections on the Problem of Advance Directives, Personhood, and Personal Identity. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):347-364.
David DeGrazia (2005). Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
Marya Schechtman (2010). Memory and Identity. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):65-79.
Michael F. Patton Jr (2002). Personal Identity, Autonomy and Advance Directives. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):65-72.
David Shoemaker (2010). The Insignificance of Personal Identity for Bioethics. Bioethics 24 (9):481-489.
Theo Van Willigenburg & Patrick J. J. Delaere (2005). Protecting Autonomy as Authenticity Using Ulysses Contracts. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):395 – 409.
E. Furberg (2012). Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #21,003 of 1,100,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,886 of 1,100,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?