|Abstract||The conflict between Hamas and the PLO-affiliated Palestinian parties has raised anew the question of self-determination, and what it means in regard to the conflicting claims to territory in Israel/Palestine. Self-determination emerged as a concept in the international community in the early twentieth century. Whether it remained a political idea only, or whether it became solidified as a norm of international law has been contested. The better side of this argument is that self-determination became accepted as a legal norm, through recognition of it by states and by international organizations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Michael Blake (2008). Allen Buchanan,Justice, Legitimacy, and Self‐Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law:Justice, Legitimacy, and Self‐Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Ethics 118 (4):721-726.
Tomis Kapitan (2006). Self-Determination and International Order. The Monist 89 (2):356 - 370.
Mark F. N. Franke (2007). Self-Determination Versus the Determination of Self: A Critical Reading of the Colonial Ethics Inherent to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):359 – 379.
Eftichios Bitsakis (2002). Forms of Physical Determination. Science and Society 66 (2):228 - 255.
Alan Strudler (1988). Self-Determination, Incompetence, and Medical Jurisprudence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):349-365.
Allen E. Buchanan (2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,872 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?