Good samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives, and epistemic obligations
Noûs 1 (4):361-379 (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSelim Berker (forthcoming). Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions. Philosophical Review.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1996). From Duty and for the Sake of the Noble: Kant and Aristotle on Morally Good Action. In Stephen Engstrom & Jennifer Whiting (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge University Press.
Emar Maier (2010). Quoted Imperatives. In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 14.
Walter E. Schaller (1992). The Relation of Moral Worth to the Good Will in Kant's Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:351-382.
Henry Prakken & Marek Sergot (1996). Contrary-to-Duty Obligations. Studia Logica 57 (1):91 - 115.
Carlos Alarcon-Cabrera (1998). Von Wright's Deontic Logics and "Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives". Ratio Juris 11 (1):67-79.
Roderick Chisholm (1963). Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic. Analysis 24 (2):33-36.
James E. Tomberlin (1981). Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Conditional Obligation. Noûs 15 (3):357-375.
Wilfrid Sellars (1967). Reflections on Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives. Noûs 1 (4):303-344.
Chase B. Wrenn (2007). Why There Are No Epistemic Duties. Dialogue: The Canadian Philosophical Review 46 (01):115-136.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
