David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 3 (3):299-323 (1969)
The article deals with two problems that arise within moorean style act-utilitarianism (a.u.): (i) how is the notion of 'the alternatives to' a particular action to be explicated? (ii) how should a.u. be formulated in order for it to validate the laws of standard deontic logic? it is argued that these intertwined problems can be solved only if the traditional formulations a a.u. are rejected in favor of some new and more viable ones. in the literature the two problems seem to have been seriously considered only by bergstrom and castaneda. in a final section the author extends his new versions of a.u. to 'sequences' of "single" particular actions and argues for the necessity of working with 'tensed' deontic notions as well as for a combination of deontic logic with tense-logic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lennart Åqvist (1973). Modal Logic with Subjunctive Conditionals and Dispositional Predicates. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):1 - 76.
Krister Bykvist (2007). Violations of Normative Invariance: Some Thoughts on Shifty Oughts. Theoria 73 (2):98-120.
Hector -Neri Castañeda (1989). Paradoxes of Moral Reparation: Deontic Foci Vs. Circumstances. Philosophical Studies 57 (1):1 - 21.
Lennart Aqvist (1971). Revised Foundations for Imperative-Epistemic and Interrogative Logic. Theoria 37 (1):33-73.
Hector -Neri Castañeda (1989). Moral Obligation, Circumstances, and Deontic Foci (a Rejoinder to Fred Feldman). Philosophical Studies 57 (2):157 - 174.
Similar books and articles
Alison Hills (2010). Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):225-242.
Afschin Gandjour & Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach (2003). Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):229-244.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1965). A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey. Inquiry 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
F. Feldman, On the Consistency of Act-Utilitarianism and Motive-Utilitarianism - a Reply to Adams,Robert.
Peter Vallentyne (1993). Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Clay Splawn (2001). “The Self-Other Asymmetry and Act Utilitarianism.”. Utilitas 13 (3):323-333.
Daniel Hunter (1994). Act Utilitarianism and Dynamic Deliberation. Erkenntnis 41 (1):1 - 35.
Thomas L. Carson (1983). Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. Erkenntnis 20 (1):49 - 60.
Gerald Lang (2004). A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #81,487 of 1,096,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #51,759 of 1,096,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?