On the logical syntax or linguistic deep structure of certain crime descriptions: Prolegomena to the doctrine of criminal intent
Synthese 65 (2):291 - 306 (1985)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKevin Gibson (1995). Fictitious Persons and Real Responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):761 - 767.
David Dolinko (2012). Review of “Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law”. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):93-102.
David M. Perlmutter (1971). Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York,Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
S. Awodey & A. W. Carus (2007). Carnap's Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax. Synthese 159 (1):23-45.
Elizabeth A. Linehan (2005). Crime and Catholic Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:61-72.
Gerald Dworkin (1985). The Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime. Law and Philosophy 4 (1):17 - 39.
Margaret L. Atherton & R. Schwarz (1974). Linguistic Innateness and its Evidence. Journal of Philosophy 71 (March):155-168.
Roger A. Shiner (2009). Theorizing Criminal Law Reform. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (2):167-186.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
