McCall's gödelian argument is invalid
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69 (2002)
Storrs McCall continues the tradition of Lucas and Penrose in an attempt to refute mechanism by appealing to Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. That is, McCall argues that Gödel’s theorem “reveals a sharp dividing line between human and machine thinking”. According to McCall, “[h]uman beings are familiar with the distinction between truth and theoremhood, but Turing machines cannot look beyond their own output”. However, although McCall’s argumentation is slightly more sophisticated than the earlier Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments, in the end it fails badly, as it is at odds with the logical facts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Storrs McCall (2001). On "Seeing" the Truth of the Godel Sentence. Facta Philosophica 3 (1):25-30.
B. Garrett (2012). A Comment on McCall. Analysis 72 (2):293-295.
J. J. C. Smart (1961). Godel's Theorem, Church's Theorem, and Mechanism. Synthese 13 (June):105-10.
Storrs McCall (1999). Can a Turing Machine Know That the Godel Sentence is True? Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):525-32.
Storrs McCall (1999). Can a Turing Machine Know That the Gödel Sentence is True? Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):525 - 532.
A. George & Daniel J. Velleman (2000). Leveling the Playing Field Between Mind and Machine: A Reply to McCall. Journal of Philosophy 97 (8):456-452.
H. Gaifman (2000). What Godel's Incompleteness Result Does and Does Not Show. Journal of Philosophy 97 (8):462-471.
John Lucas (2003). The Gödelian Argument: Turn Over the Page. Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Neil Tennant (2001). On Turing Machines Knowing Their Own Gödel-Sentences. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):72-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #104,187 of 1,934,735 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,347 of 1,934,735 )
How can I increase my downloads?